The Internet's linkage of images, sounds, texts, and up-to-date archive materials creates entirely new educational domains because they are multimedia by design and interactive by nature. Hypertext browsers function as the gateways to this interdisciplinary universe by immersing language students in multi-sensory learning environments which extend far beyond the walls of traditional classrooms. The net's almost unlimited educational tools and resources [news groups, MOOs, e-mail exchanges, listserv discussion groups, on-line conference forums, electronic articles and books, virtual encyclopaedias, museums, galleries, newspapers, etc] provide a fascinating spectrum of interdisciplinary study sites, including up-to-date links to authentic realia which teachers have long known to foster students' motivations for mastering second languages. Unlike textbooks and tapes, the interactive exhibits awaiting students on the Internet expose them to a holistic experience, since multimedia applications involves all four skills of language learning. In this intertwining of reading, writing, listening and research activities lies the great potential for helping students overcome language and literacy problems. Linking the Internet to the language laboratory has proven particularly effective for tutorials and long distance education projects.
Students are becoming increasingly less sceptical and screen shy about the benefits of Internet generated learning activities, yet there is great need for a deeper understanding about its implications for current educational practices. Our field has come a long way vis-a-vis the digital technologies, and more departments than ever before are exploiting the Internet as a new laboratory tool. To be sure, initiatives like this AATG Workshop are indicative of the growing interest in introducing more multimedia tools into our classrooms. In this methodological shift, the modern language profession is projecting an encouraging new attitude, I believe, which is somewhere in between casual concern and cautious curiosity. Concerning the integration of digital technologies, we have moved from the "so what?" and "yes, but..." attitude of the eighties to the "show me howÉ? stage of the nineties. This promising trend is one that our students have certainly come to appreciate.
The term "digital" itself dramatizes how radically different the new educational approaches really are. The methodology is highly interactive, and therein lies the interest for foreign language educators. It engages students in challenging learning activities, and helps instructors guide students toward primary sources in text, sound, symbol or image form. Teachers can function as guides to repositories of knowledge, and as navigators to new educational domains on the information network. Interactive methods can also combine holistic and analytic techniques to safeguard against the uses of informational media for propaganda purposes or commercial exploitation of the learner.
An thorough analysis of the impact of multimedia based teaching methodologies is a taxing task, as the bulky research bibliographies on foreign language education and technology indicate. Hence, the brief overview of "German Studies on the Internet" which follows is simply intended to provide practical guidelines and ideas on enhancing foreign language acquisition through multimedia. The various teaching resources, methods, and activities involving the World Wide Web are outlined according to their usefulness in the classroom.
It goes without saying that these new digital media are used best when they complement traditional forms of instruction such as lectures, group activities, textual analysis, and taped exercises. Their big advantage, however, lies in the fact that they integrate the learning process by transporting students from the linear mode of learning to the relational and the creative mode. This integration greatly enhances and expands the realm of educational possibilities available to teachers and students alike.
The enhancement of language instruction through technology creates less need for what I call the "frontal attack" style of teaching which rests on the delivery of information, and studious note taking by students. Computer-based reference materials assist in this shift away from teacher monologues by providing learners with rapid access to lecture related information. Technology can provide the basis for a more student oriented pedagogy which emphasizes synthetic learning over the linear transfer of knowledge. Meaningful learning requires that information be contextualized and that students discover relationships with other areas of the curriculum. Digital domains such as the world wide web, CD-ROMs and multimedia applications do exactly that. They immerse students in a virtual universe where the study of languages and literatures becomes an interdisciplinary and learner oriented enterprise. The computer, operating in such modes, permits rich possibilities for applied explorations and task oriented training driven by student query instead of teacher directive. This expansion of language and literature studies corresponds to current trends in the humanities which stress critical inquiries across the curriculum.
Experimenting with digital teaching technologies should be directly tied to one's own classroom work to be personally meaningful, and ought to benefit your students before it is to get recognition and support by the administration. And while retooling teaching styles and techniques to accommodate the multimedia applications, it is wise to avoid the temptation to reinvent the blackboard through electronic means. And most importantly, instructors must find ways to assure the screen shy members of their classes that the new technologies are designed to help them in their quests for knowledge without intimidating them. In my own teaching, I have found it most useful to introduce classes as groups to the new hypermedia labs on campus, and to pair the reluctant students with the more computer literate. This partnership arrangement proves not only productive for the mastery of the electronic medium but also provides for a better group dynamic in the classroom. The class begins to function as a team, in which we learn from each other what works and what doesn't.
In this student-teacher partnerships and discoveries lie the primary rewards for our efforts to appropriate new classroom technologies. Students enjoy the exploratory nature of the electronic frontier, and most of them are quite eager to tap into these exciting new resources. This awakens their curiosity, challenges their notions of literacy, and offers yet another reason for the mastery of foreign languages.
WWW Browsers function as easy gateways to the web. Viewing a WWW document with an Internet browser such as Mosaic, or Netscape is much like reading a magazine. Textual information is displayed with typographic fonts. Color graphics can be supplemented by sound that can be played by clicking an icon embedded in the document. Web documents can be interactive. User can click selected buttons on webdocuments to submit information to the Web server or to send e-mail to a programmed address. Among the most popular browsers in use today are Mosaic, Netscape and Lynx, all of which provide simple and efficient tools for surfing the net. Below are sample screens from two applications:
Example 1. Elementary Level: German Geography on the Internet
Level: Elementary German (first year), up to 35 students
Goal: Students research the Internet to obtain a geographical profile of a city in a German speaking country of their choice. They download the document, write a short German report describing the contents, and bring the document and their report to class for an oral presentation.
Application: Students use Internet browser "Mosaic" or "Netscape" to travel to one of the listed URL addresses on the World Wide Web.
Exercise Description: The Internet provides a wealth of information on almost every topic of inquiry. With browsers like "Mosaic" or "Netscape" students can surf the Internet and its world wide web of resources to reach selected archives in the U.S. and abroad, where they can study documents, texts, and images. There are numerous archives in the German speaking countries which provide information on a wide range of subjects, including language, literature, culture, history, politics, business, sports, popular culture, art, music, geography and many other disciplines. The various sites in the www are accessible through so-called "Uniform Resource Locators" (URLs) which direct the browsers to the selected study sites. Listed below are four URLs which students can use to start this exercise. It usually takes less than 10 and 12 URL jumps in the web to find what one is looking for. It can happen, however, that individual connections may be slow to open due to heavy traffic on the net, in which case students should turn to alternate URL addresses to pursue their inquiries. This exercise is designed to take approximately 35 minutes to complete.
Exercise Instructions: There are three parts to this exercise.
Part I consists of a research assignment on the world wide web: Students go to a computer laboratory on campus, and open the Internet browser "Mosaic" or "Netscape" to enter the web. There they explore the geography of a city of their choice in Austria, Germany or Switzerland. Students are asked to bring an empty disk to download and print their document from the web, or else, send the document via browser e-mail to their own mail boxes for later print out. They begin their search for information by entering one of the following URL/http addresses listed under (1), (2) or (3):
(1) Information on German cities:
(2) Information on Austrian cities:
Questions for Students / Fragen
1. Which city did you visit? Welche Stadt besuchten Sie im Internet?
2. What is the location of this city? Wo liegt die Stadt?
3. How many people live in this city? Wie groß ist die Stadt?
4. What geographical and cultural sights does the document describe? Welche Sehenswürdigkeiten beschreibt das Dokument?
5. What information (geograohical, historical, cultural, social) did you find most/least interesting?Welche Informationen über diese Stadt fanden Sie interessant oder langweilig?
Part III of this exercise involves the preparation of an oral report for class: After printing their www documents, and composing descriptive essays in German, students prepare short oral reports by addressing the same questions as listed above. The setting for these oral reports are group presentation and discussion sessions in class. For the class meeting, students are asked to bring both their www documents and their essays to class as support for their talks. The group presentations should be delivered in German, and should not take longer than two minutes each.
Evaluation: This assignment counts as a regular quiz or homework assignment. Part I (www printout) and II (essay) each counts for one half of the grade. Part III (oral report) is ungraded, and counts for practice only. The Internet advantage: Students have access to an almost unlimited pool of geographical and cultural resource materials which they can explore at their own pace. The availability of multi-lingual instructions and user guides on the net allows even reluctant learners to find their way through the exhibits, and pursue those topics which are closest to their own interests (popular culture, architecture, people, sports, tourist sites, media, etc.). The interdisciplinary scope and open-ended hypertext structure of these city archives is far superior to anything a regular textbook can offer.
Example 2. Intermediate Level: German Area Studies on the Net
Level: Intermediate German (second year), up to 25 students
Goal: Students research the Internet to obtain facts, figures, dates, and information pertaining to Germany and the European Union (EU). They visit selected archives on the EUnet, and complete an attached questionnaire. Each student is asked to write a short essay commenting on his or her research, post it via e-mail to the course's listserv, and bring a printout of the essay to class for a presentation and discussion session.
Application: Students use Internet browsers like "Mosaic" or "Netscape" to travel to selected URL addresses on the World Wide Web (www), and follow-up their www activities by using an e-mail server to post a message on the course's listserv.
Exercise Description: There are numerous archives on the web which provide information pertaining to the political, social and economic developments in Germany and Europe after the end of the Cold War (1948-1990). This exercise requires students to (1) visit selected Internet archives dealing with the history of the European Union. Upon entering the archives, they are asked to find correct facts, figures, dates, and references to fill out a questionnaire. (2) After their search, students write German commentaries describing their findings, and (3) post their commentaries on the course's listserv. Listed below are several URLs which should be used to start this exercise.
Before engaging students in this activity, however, it is useful to review the following socio-political background: The post-war trend towards European integration began in 1957 with the formation of the first European Economic Community. It included the Federal Republic of Germany, France, Italy, and the Benelux states (Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxemburg). Between 1972 and 1989, six more nations joined the European Community (EC), including Denmark, Great Britain, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain. The demise of Eastern Europe's communist camp following the revolutions of 1989 created an entirely new framework for inter-European collaboration and integration. However, the political shifts not only led to new alliances but also brought new frictions and divisions. The Czech and Slovak division, the Yugoslavian civil wars, the break-up of the former Soviet Union were all fuelled by new nationalist movements violently opposed to the notion of ethnic pluralism within a united Europe. Despite these setbacks, however, a new milestone for the creation of an "European Union" (EU) was reached in the early nineties with the signing of the Treaty of Maastricht. The EU accord prepared the way for an integrated market based on the free exchange of goods and services. Final political and monetary unity is planned for the end of this century. Among the members of the EU, Germany has taken a leading role in support of these measures. Austria recently joined the EU, while Switzerland opted to remain neutral and outside.
Exercise Instructions: There are four parts to this exercise.
Part I consists of filling out a student questionnaire based on information found in the world wide web: Students are asked to go to a computer laboratory on campus, and open the Internet browser "Mosaic" or "Netscape" to enter the web. There they explore appropriate archives to find answers to the questions listed below. In oder to find the correct answers, students begin their search by entering one of the cited URL/http addresses. The inquiries on the net should be completed within 35 minutes.
Questionnaire / Fragebogen
1. _______ When did the European Union get founded? Wann wurde
die "Europäische Union" gegründet?
2. _______ How many states are currently members of the EU? Wieviele Mitgliedsstaaten hat heute die "Europäische Union"?
3. _______ When were Germany's five new states (former GDR) integrated into the EU? Wann wurden die fünf neuen BRD-Bundesländer (ex-DDR) in die EU integriert?
4. _______ When did Austria become a member state of the EU? Wann wurde Österreich Mitglied der EU?
5. _______ Which city houses the "European Parliament"? In welcher Stadt tagt das "Europäische Parlament"?
6. _______ Where (which country) does the current president of the "European Parliament" come from? Aus welchem Land stammt der derzeitige Präsident des "Europäischen Parlaments"?
7. (a) ____ How many representatives of the "European Parliament" come from
(b) ____ (a) Germany, (b) France, (c) Spain? Wieviele Mitglieder des "Europäischen (c) ____ Parlaments" kommen aus der BRD, aus Frankreich, aus Spanien?
8. _______ Which city is the home for the "European Commission", the administrative center of the European Union (former European Community)? In welcher Stadt arbeitet die Europäische Kommission - die Verwaltungszentrale und "Regierung" der Europäischen Union (früher Europäische Gemeinschaft?
9. _______ When was the "Treaty of Maastricht" signed? Wann wurde der "Vertrag von Maastricht" unterschrieben?
10. _______ In which country does Maastricht lie? In welchem Land liegt Maastricht?
After filling out this questionnaire, students prepare a printout, and bring it to class.
Part II consists of a written homework assignment: Students
write an essay commenting on interesting EU facts and figures
they found on the Internet, and describe their thoughts and reactions
pertaining to this subject matter. The essays should bear a descriptive
title, be composed in German, and cover approximately one page
in length. Suggested generic title: "Thoughts on the European
Union".
Students print out their essays, and bring copies of them to class
for the next meeting.
Part III of this exercise requires students to post their essays on a course's listserv. This provides everyone in class with the chance to read each other's essays, and send reader response messages. Each class member is responsible for reading three posted essays (their choice), and sending three short reader response commentaries to the authors. The e-mail commentaries can be written in German or English.
Evaluation: This assignment counts as a regular composition assignment. Part I (www questionnaire) and II (essay) each counts for one half of the grade. Part III (listserv activities) is ungraded, and counts for practice only. Internet advantage: Engaging in active research on the world wide web to study current topics prompts students to scan documents from many archives, compare and contrast political perspectives, and pursue critical inquiries at the click of a button. The ease and speed of establishing these virtual connections together with the wealth of resources available on screen provides an ideal setting for self-paced learning activities. Moreover, writing and posting their research reports on the listserv creates an interactive communicative scenario, and motivates students to write for an audience of peers rather than the grade book of the instructor. Reading and evaluating each other's compositions establishes a supportive group dynamic among students, and leads to more animated and informed discussions during class.
Level: Advanced German (third & fourth year), up to 15 students
Goal: Research on the Internet to find archives and discussion lists focusing on specific issues in the field of German popular culture. Special topic for this exercise: Minority affairs in post-unification Germany: Students focus on selected issues, write analyses of their research findings, post essays via e-mail on a class listserv, and write commentaries on posted essays of other class members.
Application: Use of Internet browsers to travel to selected URL addresses on the World Wide Web (www). Use of e-mail messages to post essays on a listserv, and critique someone else's essay on the listserv.
Exercise Description: This exercise deals with the study of minority affairs in Germany after the fall of the Wall. The activity involves the world wide web to research this subject matter, collect selected texts, realia, and bibliographical references from German archives, and write an analytical essay to be posted on the listserv of the class. Before students gather information on the net, they are asked to read listserv lecture notes (entitled, for example, "Foreigners in Germany: Cultural and Historical Notes") which have been posted throughout the course of the semester, and contain references to www resource archives and materials.
Exercise Instructions: There are four parts to this exercise.
Part I consists of collecting information and composing an analytical essay on minority affairs in today's Germany: Students go to a computer laboratory on campus, and open an Internet browser to enter the web. They visit appropriate archives, and collect data and quotes for use in their analytical essays. They are asked to download, print, and attach two www documents to their papers which they found most useful or interesting. The exercise begins by visiting one of the selected www archives:
While surfing the net, students collect three text quotes to integrate into their papers, and prepare printouts of two of the most useful documents to present to class for the next meeting.
Part II consists of a written homework assignment: Each class member writes an analytical essay commenting on the subject matter of "Minorities and Minority Affairs in Post-Unification Germany". The papers should bear descriptive titles, be composed in German, cover approximately two typed pages, and contain at least three text quotes from archive documents obtained from the net. Printing the paper, and bringing a copy of it to class concludes this part of the exercise.
Part III of requires the posting of two www research documents together with student essays on the class listserv. The two documents and the paper should be mailed under separate covers with descriptive subject headings. This provides everyone in class with the chance to evaluate each other's work, and to send reader response messages. Each class member is responsible for reading two posted essays (their choice), and writing two commentaries. The first commentary pertains to a posted paper, and the other on a posted research document (their choice). The e-mail commentaries must be written in German, and clearly identify the selected documents in the subject headings. Students are asked to present an oral summary of their listserv activities at the next class meeting. The talks focus on the following questions: Which documents and papers did you read and respond to on the listserv? Which posted materials and arguments pertaining to the topic of "Minorities and Minority Affairs in Post-Unification Germany"did you find most interesting or convincing? Which open ended questions or counter-arguments do you submit to the discussion?
Evaluation: This exercise is graded as three assignments. Part I (www research documents) and III (listserv activities) count as one homework assignment each. Part II (paper) counts as a regular essay assignment. Internet advantage: The wealth of information posted on the web is far more inclusive than the printed resources available at most campuses. Beside current newspaper articles, journal essays, and archive commentaries, the discussion groups on the web provide exceptionally good resources for popular culture studies. The up-to-date contents matter, the diverse and the media oriented presentation format of these archives provide students with authentic insights into the cultural, social, and political context informing the debates. By posting their findings through e-mail on the listserv, and evaluating their works within a publicized forum, students get motivated to engage in scholarly debates.
This can be particularly useful in larger courses where discussion in the classroom is hard to begin and sustain. Of particular value for jump-starting discussions is the instructor's encouragement to respond to other students' writings through e-mail. In this way, the act of writing is geared toward a larger audience, and becomes a meaningful exercise in communicating with one's peers. If a respondent misreads a particular argument, the author of the paper often finds new motivation for improving his or her work. The teacher in this situation becomes more of a mediator and collaborator, and less of a critic and judge.